HARGM 10330, NEW SCHOOL, PRIEST LANE, RIPON
Ceramic
Building Materials
by S Garside-Neville
Introduction
Two
boxes of cbm were submitted for examination.
The date of the material ranges from the Roman period to the 19th
century or later.
Roman material
Forms
present include miscellaneous brick fragments and flue tile. It is difficult to identify Roman material
due to the fragmentary nature of the pieces.
However, the fragments identified are likely to be Roman due to the
fabric and manufacturing marks. One
definite piece of Roman material is a fragment of flue tile from context
1036. Its method of keying for plaster
or mortar is combing. Combing is a
feature associated with the 2nd century or later.
Medieval Material
The
sample is fragmentary, but it is possible to identify plain roof tile, peg tile
and brick. Some of the plain roof tile
might be later than the medieval period.
The
plain roofing tile might be either peg tile or nib tile, or possibly a
combination of both. Only peg tile is
present in the sample. The peg tile
fragment has a square peghole which was probably placed centrally at one end.
Brick
is found elsewhere in the region from the 14th century onward. However, there is no definite medieval brick
in this sample. There might be
fragments, but these cannot be identified with any certainty until larger
example of medieval brick are found for comparison.
Post medieval material
Post
medieval forms comprise brick, plain roofing and pan tile.
The
brick is dated to the post medieval period due to measurements, manufacturing
features, and fabric quality. A typical
manufacturing feature is slop moulding (where the mould is only wetted and not
sanded). One of the bricks has indented
borders (context 2014) which elsewhere in Yorkshire is a medieval feature. The measurements for the bricks from
contexts 2014 and 2022 also fall within the common medieval range. However, the bricks are slop moulded. Perhaps these bricks are immediately post
medieval in date.
Pan
tile is present, and came into use in England during the 17th century. There is a glazed brick from context 1000
which might be part of a brick associated with services.
Other material
Daub
is present in context 3129. It has wattle
rod impressions. It was found in
association with Roman brick so may be of that date.
Context
3103 has a piece of burnt sandstone with tooling marks on a smoothed surface.
Several
fragments of sandstone were examined.
These had flat surfaces and may be Elland flag. They might be part of stone roof tiles. One fragment (context 1000) has a nail hole
so was definitely a roof tile.
Context
3000 has a shaped piece of limestone.
It looks as though it might be some sort of bowl or basin.
Conclusion
The
Roman brick and tile hints at Roman building in the area. However, the pieces are quite fragmentary,
so the building is probably not close by.
The flue tile would have been part of a hypocaust so the building was
substantial. The daub comes from a less
substantial building, or perhaps an oven.
The
medieval material consists of roofing tile. This would doubtless have been
associated with a timber framed building of some king. The bricks point to
brick building in the post medieval period.
The
sample should be retained for further study.
At that point, the material should be fully recorded by a recognised
ceramic building materials specialist.
The information gathered will then be able to contribute to the study of
building works in Ripon, and also to ceramic building materials in a wider
context, such as regionally or nationally.
Context Listing
|
Cxt |
Form |
Len |
Bre |
Thi |
Comments |
Date range |
Spot date |
|
1000 |
Brick |
|
|
|
x
2 frags, Post medieval |
16th+ |
L19th+ |
|
|
Brick |
|
|
|
Hard
fabric, Glazed, Services brick |
L19th+ |
|
|
|
Brick |
|
|
52 |
Slop
moulded |
16-18th |
|
|
|
Pan |
|
|
|
x
4 frags |
17th+ |
|
|
|
Plain |
|
|
|
|
13-16th |
|
|
|
Plain |
|
|
|
|
19th+ |
|
|
|
Plain |
|
|
|
x
5 small frags |
13-16th |
|
|
|
Stone |
|
|
|
?Sandstone,
Roof tile, nailhole 8mm across |
? |
|
|
1007 |
Brick |
|
|
|
x
6 frags , Post medieval |
16th+ |
16-18th |
|
|
Brick |
|
|
47 |
|
Med? |
|
|
|
Brick |
|
|
51 |
Slop
moulded |
16-18th |
|
|
|
Brick |
|
|
55 |
Slop
moulded |
16-18th |
|
|
1011 |
Plain |
|
|
|
|
13-16th |
13-16th |
|
1020 |
Plain |
|
|
|
|
13-16th |
13-16th |
|
|
Rbrick |
|
|
|
|
1-4th |
|
|
|
Stone |
|
|
|
Limestone |
? |
|
|
1022 |
Plain |
|
|
|
|
13-16th |
13-16th |
|
1028 |
Plain? |
|
|
|
Modern |
19th+ |
19th+ |
|
1036 |
Flue |
|
|
22 |
Combed |
2-4th |
2-4th |
|
2000 |
Peg |
|
|
|
Square
peghole, 11mm across reused |
13-16th |
13-16th |
|
2010 |
Brick |
|
|
|
Reused |
Med+ |
Med+ |
|
2014 |
Brick |
|
122 |
48 |
47/8,
17/8, Slop moulded, sanded base |
16-18th? |
16-18th? |
|
|
Brick |
|
118 |
49 |
45/8,
17/8 Indented border, slop moulded |
16-18th? |
|
|
|
Brick |
|
124 |
54 |
47/8,
21/4, Slop moulded, sanded base |
16-18th? |
|
|
2022 |
Brick |
|
116 |
47 |
45/8
17/8 |
16-18th? |
17th+ |
|
|
Brick |
|
|
51 |
2 |
16-18th |
|
|
|
Pan |
|
|
|
x
4 frags |
17th+ |
|
|
2027 |
Brick |
247 |
119 |
54 |
Boot
print (female?), fine sanded base, herring bone kiss marks? |
16-18th |
16-18th |
|
|
Brick |
242 |
115 |
61 |
Slop
moulded, overfired, straw marks on sanded base |
16-18th |
|
|
2037 |
Brick |
|
|
|
Slop
moulded |
16-18th |
16-18th |
|
|
Brick |
|
|
50 |
Slop
moulded |
16-18th |
|
|
|
Brick |
|
|
50* |
|
16-18th |
|
|
2039 |
Brick |
|
|
|
Slop
moulded |
16-18th? |
16-18th? |
|
2044 |
Brick |
|
|
|
|
Med+ |
Med+ |
|
|
Rbrick |
|
|
|
Hard
fired, Sanded sides, Scrapped base |
1-4th |
|
|
|
Rbrick? |
|
|
|
|
1-4th |
|
|
2046 |
Brick |
|
|
|
|
Med+ |
Med+ |
|
|
Stone |
|
|
16 |
Fine
grained sandstone. ?Elland Flag |
? |
|
|
2100 |
Brick |
|
|
|
|
Med+ |
|
|
3000 |
Brick |
|
117 |
50 |
Slop
moulded |
16-18th |
17-18th? |
|
|
Brick |